could you please tell me why an isnothermic map is helpful rhank yoiu

Of course it's important to remember that any interpolated surface is effectively inventing data values for the areas on the map for which you don't have data or sample points. Another way is to interpolate lines of equal value across the map to create a surface which then helps us to see areas that display similarly high or low values across the map. One way is to bin your data into regularly shaped containers like hexagons, effectively a spatial summary of the point data. In analytical terms there's a number of ways one might approach the problem. Maybe I got confused and thought that what I actually heard or read was the word you, when it really was the word your.It's difficult to process patterns of dots (other than more here, less there) and even harder when you're looking at thousands of dots that overlap (death by pushpin) so.let's make a heat map! My point is that I'm not sure if this sentence structure would mean the same thing as the sentence that you wrote, or if it even is a proper structure. If I actually meant that, maybe I would write: I would appreciate you by doing that. If the sentence was modified to this: 'I would appreciate you doing that, ' you might see what I mean more clearly. I know that doesn't really make sense, but maybe it's just in this case, that using you instead of your doesn't seem to work for the meaning I'm thinking of. Although in this case, it sort of gives me a feeling that it might mean that the person who is the subject of the sentence appreciates another person, who is the object of the sentence, by means of replacing the order as soon as possible. I think I've seen such a form being used, before. I would appreciate you replacing the order as soon as possible.

What would be the difference if one wrote the following instead?

Could you please tell me why an isnothermic map is helpful rhank yoiu